2002 Lincoln Continental vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2002 Lincoln Continental is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lincoln Continental | 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Lincoln | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Continental | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 6749 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1520 mm |