2002 Lincoln Continental vs. 1995 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 2002 Lincoln Continental is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 310 more horse power than 1995 Plymouth Voyager. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1995 Plymouth Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lincoln Continental (571 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Plymouth Voyager. (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Plymouth Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lincoln Continental | 1995 Plymouth Voyager | |
Make | Lincoln | Plymouth |
Model | Continental | Voyager |
Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 571 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1650 mm |