2002 Lincoln Continental vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2002 Lincoln Continental is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 311 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lincoln Continental (571 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lincoln Continental | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
| Model | Continental | CU-X |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 410 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 571 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
