2002 Lincoln Continental vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 6. (215 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lincoln Continental (571 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 6. (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2002 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lincoln Continental | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
Model | Continental | 6 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2964 cc |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 571 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1460 mm |