2002 Lincoln Continental vs. 2011 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2011 Holden Caprice is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP) has 132 more horse power than 2011 Holden Caprice. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Caprice.
Because 2011 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lincoln Continental (571 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 2002 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lincoln Continental | 2011 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Lincoln | Holden |
Model | Continental | Caprice |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 571 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |