2002 Lincoln Continental vs. 2012 Holden UTE

To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP) has 129 more horse power than 2012 Holden UTE. (281 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden UTE.

Because 2012 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lincoln Continental (571 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 2002 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE. 2002 Lincoln Continental has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2012 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Lincoln Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: