2002 Lincoln LS vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln LS (208 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2009 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lincoln LS. (278 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lincoln LS | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Lincoln | Holden |
| Model | LS | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
