2002 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2002 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 5,768 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 572 more horse power than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. (271 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 389 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 475 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. (515 Nm). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lotec C 1000 | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Lotec | Studebaker |
Model | C 1000 | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 5768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 515 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1530 mm |