2002 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1965 Maserati Mistral
To start off, 2002 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 611 more horse power than 1965 Maserati Mistral. (232 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1965 Maserati Mistral. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 154 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 665 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Maserati Mistral. (325 Nm). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Maserati Mistral.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lotec C 1000 | 1965 Maserati Mistral | |
Make | Lotec | Maserati |
Model | C 1000 | Mistral |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 3484 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 325 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1310 mm |