2002 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1966 Morris Oxford
To start off, 2002 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP) has 783 more horse power than 1966 Morris Oxford. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1966 Morris Oxford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Morris Oxford weights approximately 44 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 868 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Morris Oxford. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lotec C 1000 | 1966 Morris Oxford | |
| Make | Lotec | Morris |
| Model | C 1000 | Oxford |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 1622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 122 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1530 mm |
