2002 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 787 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 896 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lotec C 1000 | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Lotec | Volvo |
| Model | C 1000 | 66 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1550 mm |
