2002 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320
To start off, 2002 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 623 more horse power than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320. (220 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 weights approximately 474 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 680 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320. (310 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lotec C 1000 | 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 | |
Make | Lotec | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | C 1000 | 320 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1440 mm |