2002 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2006 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2006 Toyota RunX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota RunX weights approximately 24 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2002 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lotec C 1000 | 2006 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Lotec | Toyota |
Model | C 1000 | RunX |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1530 mm |