2002 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2008 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2008 Nissan Rogue is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 673 more horse power than 2008 Nissan Rogue. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 1319 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2008 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 753 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lotec C 1000 | 2008 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Lotec | Nissan |
| Model | C 1000 | Rogue |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 2486 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 2405 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1670 mm |
