2002 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 675 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 2002 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 823 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lotec C 1000 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Lotec | Mazda |
| Model | C 1000 | 6 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 2487 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1850 mm |
