2002 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 611 more horse power than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (232 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 774 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lotec C 1000 | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Lotec | Mazda |
Model | C 1000 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 1306 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1350 mm |