2002 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP) has 603 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 750 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lotec C 1000 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Lotec | Holden |
| Model | C 1000 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
