2002 Mahindra Armada vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Armada is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 180 kg more than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Because 2002 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mahindra Armada | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Mahindra | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Armada | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4790 mm |
