2002 Mahindra Armada vs. 1965 Peugeot 204
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Armada is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Peugeot 204. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Peugeot 204 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1965 Peugeot 204. (52 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1965 Peugeot 204. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1965 Peugeot 204. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Peugeot 204. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mahindra Armada | 1965 Peugeot 204 | |
| Make | Mahindra | Peugeot |
| Model | Armada | 204 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1130 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3740 mm |
