2002 Mahindra Armada vs. 1968 Toyota Century
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Armada is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Century would be higher. At 2,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Toyota Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Toyota Century (127 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Toyota Century should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 200 kg more than 1968 Toyota Century.
Because 2002 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Toyota Century. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mahindra Armada | 1968 Toyota Century | |
| Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Century |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2981 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4990 mm |
