2002 Mahindra Armada vs. 1983 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Armada is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 910 kg more than 1983 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 2002 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mahindra Armada | 1983 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Mahindra | Mazda |
| Model | Armada | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4670 mm |
