2002 Mahindra Armada vs. 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Armada is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 280 kg more than 2002 Mahindra Armada.
Because 2002 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 2002 Mahindra Armada has manual transmission. 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mahindra Armada | 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Mahindra | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Armada | Corniche |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5210 mm |
