2002 Mahindra Armada vs. 1985 Pontiac 6000
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Armada is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Pontiac 6000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Pontiac 6000 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Pontiac 6000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Pontiac 6000 (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Pontiac 6000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 690 kg more than 1985 Pontiac 6000.
Because 2002 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Pontiac 6000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mahindra Armada | 1985 Pontiac 6000 | |
| Make | Mahindra | Pontiac |
| Model | Armada | 6000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1985 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4920 mm |
