2002 Mahindra Armada vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Armada.
Because 2002 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2002 Mahindra Armada has manual transmission. 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mahindra Armada | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mahindra | Holden |
Model | Armada | Epica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4805 mm |