2002 Mahindra Armada vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia

To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 714 kg more than 2002 Mahindra Armada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 2002 Mahindra Armada has manual transmission. 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: