2002 Mahindra Bolero vs. 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2002 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass (123 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (72 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 255 kg more than 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass (217 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (155 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2002 Mahindra Bolero has manual transmission. 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: