2002 Mahindra CL vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mahindra CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mahindra CL would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra CL weights approximately 171 kg more than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2002 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mahindra CL | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Mahindra | Mazda |
| Model | CL | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2523 cc | 1311 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1129 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2710 mm |
