2002 Mahindra CL vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mahindra CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mahindra CL would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra CL.
Because 2002 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mahindra CL | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Mahindra | Mazda |
| Model | CL | 3 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2523 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2639 mm |
