2002 Mahindra Commander vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Commander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo V40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo V40 would be higher. At 2,112 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo V40 (108 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Commander. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Commander weights approximately 15 kg more than 2000 Volvo V40.
Because 2002 Mahindra Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volvo V40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo V40 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra Commander. (123 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo V40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mahindra Commander | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
Make | Mahindra | Volvo |
Model | Commander | V40 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2112 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2670 mm |