2002 Mahindra Commander vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mahindra Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mahindra Commander would be higher. At 2,112 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Commander. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Commander weights approximately 128 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Because 2002 Mahindra Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Suzuki Reno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki Reno (171 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra Commander. (123 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mahindra Commander | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Mahindra | Suzuki |
Model | Commander | Reno |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2112 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 171 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1242 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2610 mm |