2002 Mahindra Scorpio vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Scorpio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,609 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Scorpio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mahindra Scorpio (108 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Scorpio should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Scorpio weights approximately 590 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mahindra Scorpio (260 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2002 Mahindra Scorpio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mahindra Scorpio | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mahindra | Nissan |
| Model | Scorpio | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2609 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |
