2002 Mazda 2 vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1456 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2.
Because 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 2 | 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Mazda | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 2 | Phantom |
Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 91.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Top Speed | 164 km/hour | 163 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 2591 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 6050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3690 mm |