2002 Mazda 2 vs. 1963 Steyr 500D

To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 500D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 500D would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 2 (78 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1963 Steyr 500D. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr 500D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 2 weights approximately 645 kg more than 1963 Steyr 500D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Steyr 500D is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Steyr 500D. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 2 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr 500D. (32 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr 500D.

Compare all specifications: