2002 Mazda 2 vs. 1970 Rover P5B

To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Rover P5B (159 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (78 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Rover P5B should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Rover P5B weights approximately 455 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Rover P5B is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Rover P5B. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Rover P5B (295 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1970 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications: