2002 Mazda 2 vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Triumph 2000 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (73 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 123 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1973 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (111 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1973 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 2 | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 2 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1248 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |