2002 Mazda 2 vs. 1994 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Plymouth Colt (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (78 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 100 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Plymouth Colt (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1994 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mazda 2 | 1994 Plymouth Colt | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | 2 | Colt |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2530 mm |
