2002 Mazda 2 vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 2 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1996 Proton 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 2 | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | 2 | 400 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2510 mm |