2002 Mazda 2 vs. 1998 Rover 200
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (78 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 2 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1998 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 200 (128 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 2 | 1998 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 2 | 200 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2510 mm |