2002 Mazda 2 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2007 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mazda 2 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 2 | Clio |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1399 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7250 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 292 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5550 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 93 mm |
| Top Speed | 160 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
