2002 Mazda 2 vs. 2009 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SsangYong Rexton (183 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (78 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 880 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Rexton (402 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2. 2002 Mazda 2 has automatic transmission and 2009 SsangYong Rexton has manual transmission. 2009 SsangYong Rexton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mazda 2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 2 | 2009 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | 2 | Rexton |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 402 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
Top Speed | 164 km/hour | 176 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15 seconds | 11.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 2015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |