2002 Mazda 2 vs. 2009 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (78 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 777 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Rexton (318 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2. 2009 SsangYong Rexton has automatic transmission and 2002 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2002 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 SsangYong Rexton will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 2 | 2009 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | 2 | Rexton |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 164 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1902 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 15.1 L/100km |