2002 Mazda 2 vs. 2010 Dodge Caliber
To start off, 2010 Dodge Caliber is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Caliber is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Caliber (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Caliber (223 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Caliber will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 2 | 2010 Dodge Caliber | |
Make | Mazda | Dodge |
Model | 2 | Caliber |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4415 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1534 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 5.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |