2002 Mazda 2 vs. 2011 Daihatsu Copen
To start off, 2011 Daihatsu Copen is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Daihatsu Copen (86 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Daihatsu Copen should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 2 weights approximately 310 kg more than 2011 Daihatsu Copen.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 2 (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Daihatsu Copen. (120 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Daihatsu Copen.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 2 | 2011 Daihatsu Copen | |
Make | Mazda | Daihatsu |
Model | 2 | Copen |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 79.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 160 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.5 L/100km | 6 L/100km |