2002 Mazda 323 vs. 2010 Nissan Note
To start off, 2010 Nissan Note is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 323 (97 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 323 weights approximately 108 kg more than 2010 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 323 | 2010 Nissan Note | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 323 | Note |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2600 mm |