2002 Mazda 6 vs. 1963 MG 1100
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (119 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 595 kg more than 1963 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 6 (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 6 | 1963 MG 1100 | |
Make | Mazda | MG |
Model | 6 | 1100 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2380 mm |