2002 Mazda 6 vs. 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 633 kg more than 2002 Mazda 6.
Because 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 6 | 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Mazda | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 6 | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 2118 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 107 L |