2002 Mazda 6 vs. 1975 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (120 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1975 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 6 (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 1300. (94 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: