2002 Mazda 6 vs. 1978 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1978 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (119 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 6. (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1978 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 6 | 1978 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 6 | Celica |
Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2640 mm |