2002 Mazda 6 vs. 1979 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1979 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 6 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 6 | 1979 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 6 | Mark II |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2590 mm |