2002 Mazda 6 vs. 1991 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 385 kg more than 1991 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1991 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mazda 6 | 1991 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | 6 | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1452 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
